WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Takashi Miike 1:24 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
long the first time ian john Lewis has been involved in dodgy officiating, google his name

Glenn Roeder 1:23 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
The promoter called the decision a disgrace and wants an inquiry. What’s likely to happen though. Can the fight be awarded to Cattrell if anything is found?

westhammerer 1:18 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Has to be some inquiry - awful.

Crassus 1:13 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
By one ‘judges’ scoring

Takashi Miike 1:12 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
well done Jamie Moore for speaking up, the referee Foster was bent as fuck the whole fight, let alone the judges. disgusting sport

Crassus 1:12 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
By three fucking rounds with an eight ten round against!

Pagey 1:10 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Catterall controlled the fight from start to finish, landed double the punches and also knocked Taylor down - only to be completely robbed.

The sport is clearly corrupt. What’s the point in watching certain events any more? Taylor was awful and has zero class.

Pub Bigot 1:08 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Stinks. Boxing judges are on the take. They're professional judges, that scorecard by two judges isn't open to interpretation, it's corruption.

Hope the dodgy judges crash their cars into a tree.

Crassus 1:06 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Hark at this wanker now
Hope the cunt goes up to WW and faces TC
The Cunt will be destroyed

Glenn Roeder 1:05 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Rigged scorecard, I’m no expert but that fight and judges needs looking into.

Crassus 1:04 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Cup
My jaw just hit the floor, quicker than the sweaty hit the canvas
Absolute joke, has to be bent
One cunt gave him it by THREE rounds!
How, how the fuck did that happen?
Must be BENT

westhammerer 1:04 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Absolute disgrace.

lincslink 1:02 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
Daylight robbery

cup of tea 1:02 Sun Feb 27
Re: Khan v Brook
If anyone just watched Taylor v Catterall that is the most bent corrupt decision I've seen in years

What a joke boxing has become

Council Scum 9:38 Mon Feb 21
Re: Khan v Brook
Was clear to see Khan was finished as a fighter in the first minute, the 3 years away hasn't done him any favours.

That said, I stand by my comment, people with glass jaws don't take six rounds of punishment like that and not go down.

Fair play to Brook, difficult to know if he has another one in him (although I'm sure he will take another payday) based on how poor Khan was, he looked huge against Khan.

As for Fodens Mum, you can't be swinging punches like that and not expect one back, not saying its right, but you get a lot of lowlife at boxing fights.

Manuel 4:05 Mon Feb 21
Re: Khan v Brook
You can only imagine the type of scum that attend these fights, makes the average football fan look like a choir boy.

Takashi Miike 2:29 Mon Feb 21
Re: Khan v Brook
just watched it, the cunt with the extinguisher needs locking up. it was bad enough swinging it out once, but to keep on doing it is unforgivable. the mother shouldn't start whacking people if she doesn't want a slap back

Sydney_Iron 1:42 Mon Feb 21
Re: Khan v Brook
https://twitter.com/CrimeLdn/status/1495307232631795714?t=fRHvkQz7K_ANuuqwJfFtOg&s=19

Security no where to be seen. Should've stopped that early on, Fodens Mum needs charging for her part in starting it all, still no excuse for the bloke to punch her in the face.

Extinguisher man though is very lucky he didn't connect!

Man City maybe shocked and appalled, at least Foden has little to do with any assault (through being held back) but doesn’t excuse the behaviour of his entourage in all of this, seems it started with some piss taking that Phil didn’t like, grow up son you’re a multimillionaire footballer, sticks and stones etc

White Pony 12:41 Mon Feb 21
Re: Khan v Brook
This whole “oh matty matty has made mugs of everyone” routine doesn’t ever work though, as everyone knows he’s just on a permanent wind up.

Eerie Descent 12:11 Mon Feb 21
Re: Khan v Brook
Stevethehammer 11:08 Sun Feb 20

I can't understand such hatred towards him.. I get he was over-hyped, but has always come across as alright, albeit a bit thick.

He was an absolute class act after the fight, especially the way he entered and engaged in the post fight press conference.

Sydney_Iron 11:59 Sun Feb 20
Re: Khan v Brook
Briano 10:04 Sun Feb 20

Have to agree, not the biggest fan of the sport but will watch the big fights, only ever went to one bout years ago and it was very "pikey" unless your getting premium seats then is to be avoided IMO.

Prev - Page 2 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: